Pragmatic is a word that is often used to describe someone who thinks in terms of realistic options or courses of action. It is also a research paradigm that focuses on incorporating the best methods and knowledge from many sources into a study. Pragmatism is especially appropriate for mixed or multimethod research, in which quantitative and qualitative data are analyzed simultaneously.
In the business world, pragmatic skills are crucial for effective teamwork and building strong professional relationships. Individuals who possess pragmatic communication skills can navigate office dynamics, understand and respond to different communication styles, and convey ideas clearly and concisely. They can build trust and foster strong connections based on mutual understanding and respect. However, some people struggle with pragmatic communication, resulting in misunderstandings and strained relationships. Pragmatic communication can be improved through strategies that focus on context, understanding social cues, and adapting to the situation.
William James and Charles Peirce developed pragmatism in the United States, though the term was already well known to some European scholars. It became particularly prominent in the 1920s through Frank Ramsey’s work at Cambridge, where he applied Peirce’s ideas to statistical reasoning and inquiry (Misak 2018). Some of the most significant contributions to pragmatism have come from philosophers of language and communication. Pragmatics has a special interest in questions about what speakers mean when they say things, the circumstances and contexts of their utterances, their intentions, and their actions. It also looks at how hearers try to figure these out and make sense of what speakers say.
James viewed pragmatism as a method for settling metaphysical disputes that might otherwise be interminable. He argued that, in this way, it can identify ‘empty disputes’, which are disputed because they have no practical difference for anyone. (James 1907: 28) Peirce, in his philosophy of science and ethics, applied pragmatism to the question of whether scientific truths are objective or subjective and to the problem of what constitutes a genuine mode of knowing.
As a philosophy, pragmatism is often contrasted with idealism. The former refers to a preference for concrete, realistic outcomes while the latter refers to adherence to principles regardless of the cost. Pragmatists, however, do not believe that pragmatism offers the ultimate political perspective or true social theory and instead start with an ethics-based pursuit of democracy, equality, justice, and freedom for all.
Being pragmatic can help us be more efficient and effective in problem-solving and decision-making. Pragmatists are able to assess situations objectively and focus on finding feasible solutions that lead to real results. They avoid getting bogged down in abstract theories and take a hands-on approach to challenges, making them effective leaders and businesspeople. Several notable pragmatic individuals include Elon Musk, Angela Merkel, Warren Buffett, and Malala Yousafzai. They are all entrepreneurs, CEOs, and activists who demonstrate the benefits of a pragmatic mindset.